Showing posts with label Melissa McCarthy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Melissa McCarthy. Show all posts

Monday, April 27, 2020

Can You Ever Forgive Me? (2018)

Director: Marielle Heller

A very solid if not spectacular rendering of a rather unique, based on real life tale focused on an unconventional protagonist.

Can You Ever Forgive Me? related the criminal activities of Lee Israel (Melissa McCarthy), a once-successful biographer, when her writing career has dried up to the point that she can no longer even make rent or pay for several bare necessities. Unable and unwilling to change her highly irritable personality or take suggestions from her publisher, Israel begins forging letters from dead celebrities and selling them to to bookstores around New York City for tidy sums. Her writing mimicry skills are excellent enough to fool even professionals for some time, but eventually the collector scene catches on and she has to go to greater lengths to pull of her forgeries. She even enlists her newly-made friend Jack (Richard E. Grant), an aged and charismatic party-goer and survivor who manages to couch-surf his way through a drug-addled existence.

Being a bibliophile who worked in bookstores for years, this story was one of great interest to me. It certainly benefits greatly from the fact that it is based on the very real Lee Israel and uses many of the facts around her life as a writer and forger. Anyone who can appreciate the artist's eye or ear for writing can marvel at what Israel was able to pull off for years, aping the styles of many different celebrity writers and playwrights well enough to fool even discriminating collectors. A viewer who doesn't care much for that subject matter probably won't find the story terribly engaging, but it was plenty for me and my wife, herself a poet and appreciator of writing ability.

The performances were also great. This should come as no surprise when it comes to Richard E. Grant, who has long been a fantastic actor, especially when playing charismatic, irresponsible addicts such as Jack. The real surprise is just how excellent McCarthy is, given the need for some real dramatic gravitas for the role. Lee Israel is portrayed as a mostly unlikable, alcoholic recluse who is in the deep throes of self pity and inflexibility. While she has a biting wit that lends some levity to her character and the film, it is never of the more bombastic, even slapstick variety of humor for which McCarthy is best known. Instead, McCarthy conveys every bit of Israel's dry, caustic humor with just the right amount of jaded cynicism required. It certainly makes me curious to see her in more dramatic roles in the future.

I will say that I found the movie's dialogue, and even the dynamic between Israel and Jack to be flat and a bit under-developed. It seemed to think that some of the jokes were a bit funnier than I found them to be, and the bond between Israel and Jack at times felt a tad forced. Neither of these was a fatal flaw by any means - just a few areas that I felt could have been stronger.

I enjoyed this one, though. Highly recommended for those who are into literature and real-life tales about those on the fringes of the industry. 

Sunday, September 17, 2017

Retro Duo: Drive (2011); The Heat (2013)

Drive (2011)

Director: Nicolas Winding Refn

One of my favorite movies from the last decade. I just watched it for the fourth or fifth time, and I still marvel at it.

The basic story elements are straight out of the mythical Western movies of Sergio Leone: a quiet man with no name and a particular skill set is not bothered by committing acts outside of the law. However, he does have a certain code of honor to which he holds himself. When he sees the forces of darkness closing in, he decides to use his skills to fight back. In the case of director Nicolas Winding Refn's Drive, instead of a gunfighter, we have "Driver" (Ryan Gosling), who is a movie stunt driver moonlighting as a getaway "wheel man" for robbers. When Driver (his real name is never given) falls in love with his neighbor, Irene (Carey Mulligan), he starts to show a tenderness unseen to us before. This nearly all vanishes, however, when Irene's husband is first paroled out of prison but then forced into committing a robbery that goes horribly wrong. Driver then finds himself in a race to track down the gangsters responsible, while keeping Irene and her little boy safe.

While Drive is not telling a story that is particularly fresh, it updates the "quiet, lone hero" tale wonderfully and tells it with such cinematic excellence that it shames other movies that have tried the same thing since Leone first mastered it in the mid-1960s. Admittedly, it helps if one has a certain affinity for this type of protagonist. I've long been a fan of Leone and Clint Eastwood's (we can technically throw Charles Bronson in there, too) Man With No Name character. I'm far from the only boy in the history of humanity who's been fascinated by the fantasy of the ever-cool and unflappable hero who is so skilled that he can take down any adversary, often without breaking much of a sweat. Ryan Gosling's Driver is cut from that same cloth, though he's traded in Eastwood's dusty serape for a slick, silver driving jacket with a badass scorpion on the back.

I know, I know. If you haven't seen the movie, you're thinking, "Come on. A silent, badass loner wearing a scorpion jacket? This is a joke, right?" No. It's not. By a lesser filmmaker, it would be laughable, to be sure. But this screenplay and direction are so tight that it's brilliant. The narrative is a case-study in cinematic efficiency, with nary a wasted scene or throwaway line to be found in the entire film. And while there is certainly plenty of intense action and violence in the latter parts of the movie, much of the earlier segments feature delicate and subtle visual cues to tell the story. These subtleties are what make the action sequences in the third act of the movie so much more impactful.

I've spoken to a few friends who have watched the movie and simply found it too slow, quiet, and brooding for their liking. I understand this. If one prefers their action to be highly kinetic and offer strings of one-liners to bridge the action scenes, a la the Fast and the Furious franchise, then Drive is not the movie for you. In place of those styles of storytelling, Drive offers stunningly framed and lit scenes, expert editing, a meditative tone, and pitch-perfect acting (the supporting cast is amazing) to tell a story that is both classic and unique. There aren't many non-popcorn movies that I watch every year or two, but this quickly became one of them. After this most recent viewing, this is not at all likely to change.


This great throwback poster gives some
idea of the tone of the movie. Think of
it as a more comedic, profane version of
Lethal Weapon.
The Heat (2013)

Director: Paul Feig

A bit of a forerunner for the even-better, modern comedy classic Spy, The Heat is a hilarious early team-up of comedy director Paul Feig and brilliant comedienne Melissa McCarthy.

The movie pairs stuffy, arrogant F.B.I. Agent Ashburn (Sandra Bullock) with local hardass Boston police officer Mullins (McCarthy) as they try to track down a high-volume drug dealer responsible for several grizzly deaths in recent months. Ashburn is a well-educated and capable but highly abrasive, career-driven woman who has alienated virtually every coworker in the Bureau. Mullins, on quite the other hand, is Ashburn's polar opposite in nearly every way. While she is equally effective at tracking and capturing criminals, her approach is far less surgical and much more that of a wrecking ball, speaking to her background as the eldest sister in her Irish, working class family. Mullins is supremely crass and on a hair trigger at all times. She and Ashburn eventually bridge the tremendous gap between their styles of law enforcement and work together to solve the case.

Anyone who has seen and enjoyed either Bridesmaids or Spy would do well to check out The Heat. Director Paul Feig has found his modern comedy movie niche with the formula evidenced in these movies (though Spy was impressively less formulaic than the other two): use a known story blueprint, hire several supremely hilarious actors, and let them run with their lines and characters. That is truly where the strength of these movies lie. When you give someone like McCarthy a few decent lines or a dynamic character to work with, along with R-rated freedom, she'll either deliver the written line with perfect timing and tone, or she'll punch it up into something even better. And not to slight Sandra Bullock here, who does a great job as the straight woman, but it's McCarthy's attitude and comic chops that set the tone here. It also helps to have some other veteran comic actors like Bill Burr and Michael Rappaport as supporting characters, just so no single voice or pair of voices dominate for too long.

Like nearly every Paul Feig movie I've seen, The Heat is probably about 10 to 15 minutes too long, due to overly generous editing. It's fairly clear that much of Feig's approach is to grant his actors a ton of freedom to ad-lib as much as they desire. This is as it should be, as it clearly leads to plenty of hilarious moments of spontaneous dialogue and reactions. However, every film of his contains at least a few scenes that feel a tad too long or simply superfluous, bogging down the narrative pace just a bit. Fortunately, they've never been a complete drag on his movies, and The Heat is the same.

I was glad to learn that shortly after I watched this movie, a sequel was announced. The trio of Feig, McCarthy, and Bullock was obviously a strong one, and there are plenty more tales of Ashburn and Mullins that would be fun to tell. I'll look forward to it.